View Single Post
Old 12-27-2011, 10:31 AM   #11 (permalink)
Diesel_Dave
Master EcoModder
 
Diesel_Dave's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Indiana
Posts: 1,194

White Whale - '07 Dodge Ram 2500 ST Quad Cab 2wd, short bed
Team Cummins
90 day: 37.68 mpg (US)
Thanks: 112
Thanked 511 Times in 213 Posts
It's interesting how consumers tend to shoot themselves in the foot concerning FE. A couple years ago I recall sitting in a presentation, where the presenter showed a plot of US model year vs. engine efficiency (1970's or so to present). It was pretty impressive to see how much more efficient the modern engines are.

But then he shown fuel comsumption per mile over the same time period. It was nearly flat! What happened? As the engines were made more efficient, people felt like they could now "afford" a heavier, more powerful vehicle (think SUV), that was more efficient (thermodynamically speaking), but got about the same mileage.

Interesting how consumers "feed back" on changes in technology!

__________________
Diesel Dave

My version of energy storage is called "momentum".
My version of regenerative braking is called "bump starting".

1 Year Avg (Every Mile Traveled) = 47.8 mpg

BEST TANK: 2,009.6 mi on 35 gal (57.42 mpg): http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...5-a-26259.html


  Reply With Quote