View Single Post
Old 12-28-2011, 12:17 PM   #10 (permalink)
COcyclist
Aero Wannabe
 
COcyclist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: NW Colo
Posts: 738

TDi - '04 VW Golf
TEAM VW AUDI Group
90 day: 52.55 mpg (US)
Thanks: 705
Thanked 219 Times in 170 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by fusion210 View Post
Although it's argued that the biggest gains are at the rear, I think some of the lowest hanging fruit is sealing off any useless gaps in the front end and constricting airflow to the radiator.
This is an area of very high pressure air trying to force its way into every drag producing opening or gap.

Quote:
Originally Posted by KamperBob View Post
Between experts here and what I've read so far from Hucho and Hoerner there is interaction between front and rear. If (IF!) a given vehicle already has fully attached flow, THEN it seems that wake reduction provides more bang for the buck. If the front, top, sides and/or bottom are a mess producing detachment than wake reduction offers limited return.
I have been working from front to back on my vehicle, figuring I needed attached flow for the mods at the back to be effective.


Quote:
Originally Posted by KamperBob View Post
Perfect onset flow and attachment also tend to amplify base drag. So without good rear treatment, forebody work alone is limited. Everything matters.
Interesting, I don't have Hucho so I hadn't heard this before. So now that my front end and underside is smooth, I really need to get moving on my hitch mounted boattail/cargo carrier.
__________________
60 mpg hwy highest, 50+mpg lifetime
TDi=fast frugal fun
https://ecomodder.com/forum/showthre...tml#post621801


Quote:
Originally Posted by freebeard View Post
The power needed to push an object through a fluid increases as the cube of the velocity. Mechanical friction increases as the square, so increasing speed requires progressively more power.
  Reply With Quote