View Single Post
Old 05-24-2008, 02:05 PM   #22 (permalink)
Big Dave
Master EcoModder
 
Big Dave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Steppes of Central Indiana
Posts: 1,319

The Red Baron - '00 Ford F-350 XLT
90 day: 27.99 mpg (US)

Impala Phase Zero - '96 Chevrolet Impala SS
90 day: 21.03 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 186 Times in 127 Posts
When the EPA first started putting restrictions on car engines, it was a disaster for the motorist. The cars of 1973 were the worst cars ever built. The relative performance levels of 1972 were not restored until well into the mid 90s, and that took a revolution in computerized engine management.

Yeah, there is a heckuva learning curve – a twenty year learning curve if past is prologue, but we have no engine management revolution showing on the horizon, just $4500 filter/afterburners that wreck fuel economy. The loss of performance may last even longer this time.

And for that we get…what? Has the EPA given us any metric of health benefits that will be realized from Tier II? Not that I know of.

This is a very valid discussion to have. When society is asked to pay a steep price, one has a right to expect some sort of payoff, but I just don’t see any promises about the benefits of Tier II and ULSD requirements.
__________________
2000 Ford F-350 SC 4x2 6 Speed Manual
4" Slam
3.08:1 gears and Gear Vendor Overdrive
Rubber Conveyor Belt Air Dam
  Reply With Quote