Quote:
Originally Posted by iceQuity
I don't understand the question... The DynoValve is tested on many different vehicles... ARB does not test every vehicle to get certified... Those vehicles in the ARB test is the vehicle used and the data is from the vehicles tested.
|
A. The term "OEM," as used in this misleading chart, is meant to specify what a representative year/make/model vehicle should get right from the factory. It does not mean what a particular vehicle of that year/make/model, under test, was actually getting just prior to installing the overhyped SpamoValve.
B. While it is possible for a vehicle to get xx.
00 MPG, it's rather unlikely, as test conditions and results are rarely so clean so as to get a result of x.
00 MPG. That 11 out of 15 vehicles on that misleading chart of yours have indeed shown x.
00 MPG in both OEM and after-modification fuel efficiency columns, seems to stretch beyond belief any credibility in those figures.
C.
You yourself posted one of those flat-out wrong charts.
Please pay attention to what you're posting...
Now - You have yet to answer the question about why the results sheet for one vehicle contains data from a completely different vehicle.
You have yet to answer why you're posting EPA standards for your baseline, instead of the original vehicle measurements.
You have yet to answer how this magical device you're peddling is supposed to increase fuel economy.
We are not swayed by your marketing bull$#!7.