View Single Post
Old 02-02-2012, 03:53 PM   #12 (permalink)
ps2fixer
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: MI, USA
Posts: 571

92 Camry - '92 Toyota Camry LE
Team Toyota
90 day: 26.81 mpg (US)

97 Corolla - '97 Toyota Corolla DX
Team Toyota
90 day: 30.1 mpg (US)

Red F250 - '95 Ford F250 XLT
90 day: 20.34 mpg (US)

Matrix - '04 Toyota Matrix XR
90 day: 31.86 mpg (US)

White Prius - '06 Toyota Prius Base
90 day: 48.54 mpg (US)
Thanks: 8
Thanked 73 Times in 50 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by tjts1 View Post
Thats about $3500-6000 more than they're worth. The only thing that keeps them in that range is lack of supply and a tiny group of fanatical customers. Otherwise they're just like any other 30 year old economy car. Worthless.
Your right, I should be going for a 30 year old non-economy based truck... how about a 1978 Ford Truck with a tiny 460 engine. It must be the better pick, it has a huge price tag too!

:: 1978 Ford Crew Cab 4X4 Show Truck - Flemings Ultimate Garage

Joking aside now, how can you bash a small vehicle that holds a value due to being a little rare and gets good MPG figures? That would be about like me saying the new hybrid cars are junk because they should be 100% electric.


Anyway, show me a better priced pickup that gets 30mpg+ that you wouldn't consider junk and not cost over 5 grand in great working shape. Also no electrics since I have a long way to drive to work and I can't afford them batteries for that type of range. Oh it has to be fairly reliable, so that throws out most 2000 and newer trucks (in my opinion). The main ones I know of that are similar are:

Dodge Rampage
Ford Ranchero
El Camino

Most of them can't hit 30mpg, I would be better off going with a 1992-1996 Toyota Camry Wagon stick with a 2.2L and get around 25mpg maybe 27mpg with a few small mods and have it last 300k+ miles.
  Reply With Quote