View Single Post
Old 02-15-2012, 02:43 AM   #3 (permalink)
Ladogaboy
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 588

Ladogaboy - '11 Mitsubishi Lancer EVO GSR
Team Emperor
90 day: 27.64 mpg (US)

E85 EVO - '11 Mitsubishi Lancer EVO GSR
90 day: 21.38 mpg (US)
Thanks: 59
Thanked 59 Times in 47 Posts
There has been some information posted stating that wider tires have a lower coefficient of rolling resistance (i.e., lower rolling resistance than their narrower counterparts), but I'm not sure how that translates into real world mpg. Your mileage is affected by aerodynamics more than rolling resistance, so having a wider tire might still cost you mileage despite the decrease rolling resistance.

That being said, the composition of the tire is more important, and M/S and summer tires are probably equally bad on mileage. Most of the good LRR tires are A/S. Also, if the tires are taller, you'll gain a few % just based on fewer rotations per distance traveled.
__________________
  Reply With Quote