Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 02-15-2012, 01:27 AM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Sidney NY USA
Posts: 64

Horse with no name - '00 Ford Mustang Base
Team Mustang
90 day: 20.53 mpg (US)

Orange peel - '00 Ford Focus SE
90 day: 26.83 mpg (US)
Thanks: 3
Thanked 11 Times in 7 Posts
Gas mileage loss with wider tires?

I am looking for new wheels and tires for my 2000 V6 mustang. I found some for a good price but they are very wide. They are 275 wide compared to the stock tires of 205. They will be summer tires and not the M/S I normally run in the summer. They will be 17" wheels verses the 15" I now run meaning total weight will be less. I was wondering if anyone had any real would experience on wider tires and fuel mileage?

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 02-15-2012, 02:27 AM   #2 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
mcrews's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,523

The Q Sold - '02 Infiniti Q45 Sport
90 day: 23.08 mpg (US)

blackie - '14 nissan altima sv
Thanks: 2,203
Thanked 663 Times in 478 Posts
actually, unless you have already weight them, the probably weight more.
And unless the are a little taller, your screwed.
they are stickier so they wont roll easy.
__________________
MetroMPG: "Get the MPG gauge - it turns driving into a fuel & money saving game."

ECO MODS PERFORMED:
First: ScangaugeII
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...eii-23306.html

Second: Grille Block
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...e-10912-2.html

Third: Full underbelly pan
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...q45-11402.html

Fourth: rear skirts and 30.4mpg on trip!
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...tml#post247938
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2012, 02:43 AM   #3 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 588

Ladogaboy - '11 Mitsubishi Lancer EVO GSR
Team Emperor
90 day: 27.64 mpg (US)

E85 EVO - '11 Mitsubishi Lancer EVO GSR
90 day: 21.38 mpg (US)
Thanks: 59
Thanked 59 Times in 47 Posts
There has been some information posted stating that wider tires have a lower coefficient of rolling resistance (i.e., lower rolling resistance than their narrower counterparts), but I'm not sure how that translates into real world mpg. Your mileage is affected by aerodynamics more than rolling resistance, so having a wider tire might still cost you mileage despite the decrease rolling resistance.

That being said, the composition of the tire is more important, and M/S and summer tires are probably equally bad on mileage. Most of the good LRR tires are A/S. Also, if the tires are taller, you'll gain a few % just based on fewer rotations per distance traveled.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2012, 08:20 AM   #4 (permalink)
Tire Geek
 
CapriRacer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Let's just say I'm in the US
Posts: 796
Thanks: 4
Thanked 393 Times in 240 Posts
While wider tires have less rolling resistance, the effect is small compared to the differences between tires. At 275 width, you're in the range where RR is not the desired attribute and the tires don't have good RR - and summer tires will be worse than all season tires.

With the 15" tires, you are much more likely to find tires that meet your excpectation for fuel economy/traction/treadwear, all 3 of which are tradeoffs.

Choose wisely.
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2012, 09:01 AM   #5 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
euromodder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Belgium
Posts: 4,683

The SCUD - '15 Fiat Scudo L2
Thanks: 178
Thanked 652 Times in 516 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by pjbgravely View Post
They are 275 wide compared to the stock tires of 205.
If you've been happy with M/S (didn't you mean A/S ?) tires in summer, I'd say you don't need 275 wide tires.

A dedicated, decent summer tire will outperform the all seasons, and Mud and snow variety.

Even sporty tires can't escape the current trend towards greener tires with less RR, so you can nowhave tires that combine good performance with reduced RR to get good mileage.

Quote:
They will be 17" wheels verses the 15" I now run meaning total weight will be less
Unsprung weight will most likely increase with bigger wheels, unless you've deliberately chosen lighter wheels.
Lower profile tires on the 17" wheels will be heavier per inch of rubber they add to the diameter, so that's another weight increase.
__________________
Strayed to the Dark Diesel Side

  Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2012, 01:37 PM   #6 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Sidney NY USA
Posts: 64

Horse with no name - '00 Ford Mustang Base
Team Mustang
90 day: 20.53 mpg (US)

Orange peel - '00 Ford Focus SE
90 day: 26.83 mpg (US)
Thanks: 3
Thanked 11 Times in 7 Posts
Thanks for the replies. The reason I am getting new rims is to prevent the rush to get studded snow tires put on/taken off when the law allows. If I can do it myself it would be a lot easier.

Buying used wheels for my car seems impossible, the places I go say that they are all damaged from hitting curbs. I guess there are a lot of bad drivers out there. I have not found any after market 15" wheels I can afford, If I could that is what I prefer to use.

I see now that these tires are probably way too wide to not effect aerodynamics. I am going to install splats but I didn't want them to stick out from below the car.

Paul
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2012, 04:06 PM   #7 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
mcrews's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,523

The Q Sold - '02 Infiniti Q45 Sport
90 day: 23.08 mpg (US)

blackie - '14 nissan altima sv
Thanks: 2,203
Thanked 663 Times in 478 Posts
Paul,

sometimes 'opprotunities' arise and we have to weigh the choice.
Decissions are not always as clear cut as someone looking from the outside says it is.

For example: I REALLY want clear flat wheel covers BUT I have factory alloy rims and I'm not going to drill holes in them to hold the clear cover on. Nor am I going to change to a steel rim and do flat wheel covers.

But atleast you have some more information than you had before.

I would find some nice piece of higway and do an 'a' test now and then a 'b' test with the new setup.
__________________
MetroMPG: "Get the MPG gauge - it turns driving into a fuel & money saving game."

ECO MODS PERFORMED:
First: ScangaugeII
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...eii-23306.html

Second: Grille Block
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...e-10912-2.html

Third: Full underbelly pan
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...q45-11402.html

Fourth: rear skirts and 30.4mpg on trip!
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...tml#post247938
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2012, 04:46 PM   #8 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
basjoos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Upstate SC
Posts: 1,088

Aerocivic - '92 Honda Civic CX
Last 3: 70.54 mpg (US)

AerocivicLB - '92 Honda Civic CX
Team Honda
90 day: 55.14 mpg (US)

Camryglide - '20 Toyota Camry hybrid LE
90 day: 65.83 mpg (US)
Thanks: 16
Thanked 677 Times in 302 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by pjbgravely View Post
Buying used wheels for my car seems impossible, the places I go say that they are all damaged from hitting curbs. I guess there are a lot of bad drivers out there. I have not found any after market 15" wheels I can afford, If I could that is what I prefer to use.

Paul
Go look for "take off" wheels. These are the OEM wheels that some owners have removed (and trade in) when they buy a set of fancy new wheels for their new car. You can often get them next to new for very low prices since they are OEM and aren't considered "cool" by the automotive performance crowd.
__________________
aerocivic.com
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2012, 09:04 PM   #9 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: pjs NY
Posts: 59

Elle - '10 Honda Element SC
Thanks: 1
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
if your wheels are toast. I have a set that would work with only 13k miles

they are not 15s. there 18X7s +45 with 225/55-18 they should be the 2005+ mustang diameter if not slightly larger. and prob much more efficient then 275s.

let me know if yer interested and you can test em out.

I picked up 19s and im getting 16s for winter so these will be of no use they were the oem they have a nice flat lip for a lexan wheel cover.

btw. if you dont mind me asking whats your budget? I can atleast help you source some 15s


Last edited by racerc2000; 02-15-2012 at 09:11 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2012, 09:21 PM   #10 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: california
Posts: 1,329
Thanks: 24
Thanked 161 Times in 107 Posts
The main factor is increased aerodynamic drag from the larger frontal area, not rolling resistance.

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread


Tags
fuel, mileage, tires, wider





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com