View Single Post
Old 02-28-2012, 09:45 PM   #47 (permalink)
Olympiadis
oldschool
 
Olympiadis's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Illinois
Posts: 184

White2003Focus - '03 Ford Focus SE 4-door sedan
Team Ford
90 day: 38.53 mpg (US)

White2001S10pickup - '01 Chevy S10 extended cab LR
Last 3: 24.51 mpg (US)

1989DodgeOMNI - '89 Dodge Omni
Last 3: 30.38 mpg (US)

1991ChevyC1500pickup - '91 Chevy C1500
Last 3: 24.03 mpg (US)

White1986Irocz - '86 Chevy Irocz LB9
Last 3: 30.14 mpg (US)

1999 C5 Corvette - '99 Chevy Corvette

2008 Infinity G37 - '08 Infinity G37
Thanks: 21
Thanked 35 Times in 25 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by drmiller100 View Post
look up lean burn. the basic idea is you are cruising down the freeway at 60 mph. lean the mixture down to 20 to 1, requiring more throttle to keep the flames lit. at the same time, advance the timing a BUNCH (30 degrees plus).

do it all right, EGT's drop, economy goes up. Do it wrong, you get detonation.
Lean burn in the sense you described can only be used in certain types of engines and used efficiently only in a certain window of conditions. It does work (increases FE) to an extent, but that is primarily because a 20:1 AFR requires ~35% less fuel to maintain. The efficiency of the engine doesn't really increase so much by way of a wider throttle opening.

The lean burn by way of power reduction in a window of operation also has the effect of increasing throttle (VE) resolution, thus making it a bit easier to drive efficiently.
A very steady cruise on a flat surface is the ideal situation for this type of reduced power operation.
  Reply With Quote