View Single Post
Old 03-02-2012, 02:00 AM   #16 (permalink)
uRabbit
'09 Honda Fit Sport AT
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 26

Fit - '09 Honda Fit Sport
90 day: 30.58 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Haha. You guys are really jackoffs around here. Pretty funny, actually. How do you consider CleanMPG a "lesser" site? Aren't we all in this to obtain the same goal? Sounds like an Apple vs. Microsoft debate...

Also, I believe the word you are looking for is "intelligent," not "intelegent." But hey, be a dork.

Actually, I was coming for input to sway me one way or the other. Was wondering if the MPG gains were worth the loss in ride quality. I read these threads before-hand:
(see next post)

Calling someone a "newb," claiming another web site is "lesser," and getting a higher percentage of the EPA than someone else, does not necessarily make you any better of a person. Just so you know. I don't get higher percentage because I do not pulse-and-glide. Why? Because most of our driving is done at night, so I cannot ICE-off P&G (lights don't stay on), so I ICE-on P&G instead, which is much less effective.

My low post count does not make me a so-called "newb." Nor does my percentage of EPA. The low post count does mean that I am a new poster, but not a new reader. A lot of mods require either money or extensive knowledge; both of which I do not have. That, possibly, may make me a "newb."

If it makes you feel any better, I congratulate you for attaining such high numbers, and I appreciate that you are doing one of the following: 1) Trying to lower our nation's dependence on foreign oil, 2) Trying to lower our nation's dependence on oil, period, 3) Trying to save our planet, 4) Trying to save a buck or two.

So, good job all!
__________________


No modifications. Engine-on P&G. No gauge.
  Reply With Quote