Quote:
Originally Posted by shovel
|
Again, that is the direct costs. It does not take into account all of the indirect costs of corn based ethanol use:
1)Decreased efficiency--there is not a 1:1 energy comparison of ethanol to gasoline, and given that petroleum based fuel is used in the production of ethanol than there isn't even a 1:1 replacement factor.
2)inflated costs of corn based products--beyond livestock feed, there a way too many products to name (plastics, linens, etc, etc, etc.)
3)Reduced corn exports--Corn could easily be one of our most viable exports.
4) on, and on, and on.
I'm just saying there has to be a better alternative than corn (grass, seaweed, something)