View Single Post
Old 05-09-2012, 10:16 PM   #20 (permalink)
redpoint5
Human Environmentalist
 
redpoint5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,834

Acura TSX - '06 Acura TSX
90 day: 24.19 mpg (US)

Lafawnda - CBR600 - '01 Honda CBR600 F4i
90 day: 47.32 mpg (US)

Big Yeller - Dodge/Cummins - '98 Dodge Ram 2500 base
90 day: 21.82 mpg (US)

Chevy ZR-2 - '03 Chevrolet S10 ZR2
90 day: 17.14 mpg (US)

Model Y - '24 Tesla Y LR AWD

Pacifica Hybrid - '21 Chrysler Pacifica Hybrid
90 day: 43.3 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,330
Thanked 4,488 Times in 3,451 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fat Charlie View Post
the brisk acceleration that you want in your pulse & glide or stop & go can be more efficiently acconplished by reducing the weight that you are accelerating.
True that acceleration will be quicker with less weight, and I agree about the benefits of reducing it. However, the added weight will also extend the glide portion of the pulse and glide technique. While it may take longer to accelerate, it will also take longer for speed to bleed off.

My motorcycle is terrible at the pulse and glide because it's so aerodynamically inefficient compared to the weight. The instant I'm off the throttle, speed plummets. It takes a heck of a steep down-hill for me to maintain speed at coast. The same hill in my car would produce too much speed.
__________________
Gas and Electric Vehicle Cost of Ownership Calculator







Give me absolute safety, or give me death!
  Reply With Quote