View Single Post
Old 06-08-2012, 07:13 PM   #6 (permalink)
redneck
Master EcoModder
 
redneck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: SC Lowcountry
Posts: 1,796

Geo XL1 - '94 Geo Metro
Team Metro
Boat tails and more mods
90 day: 72.22 mpg (US)

Big, Bad & Flat - '01 Dodge Ram 3500 SLT
Team Cummins
90 day: 21.13 mpg (US)
Thanks: 226
Thanked 1,354 Times in 711 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Tele man View Post
HINT -- "...reading between the lines..." one can get general ideas of 'how much' various "changes" might affect fuel economy -- EPA did the "testing" all we have to do is do the "trying."
Good eyes...

Like you said, they already did the testing.

I just happen to have a 1974 Chevy C10 that was retro fitted with the same diesel engine except it is a 6cy. 92hp.

I haven't driven it in a while, 2-3 yrs. It just sits in the garage. lol

From what I remember it got 19 hwy,22 city.

It has a 4 speed manual, don't remember the rear end ratio. But, as it is a 4000 rpm engine it was screaming pretty good on the highway, hence the reversal on the mpg figures. I have a 5 speed IROC tranny waiting to go in. It has a 30% overdrive and should help bring down the rpm's for better fuel effiency.

Too many projects, not enough time.

>
  Reply With Quote