Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 06-08-2012, 02:12 PM   #1 (permalink)
...beats walking...
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: .
Posts: 6,190
Thanks: 179
Thanked 1,525 Times in 1,126 Posts
EPA paper on '71 Diesel-powered Pinto

EPA paper on 1971 Diesel-powered Pinto: http://nepis.epa.gov/Adobe/PDF/9100X4Q9.PDF

Especially look at MPG's given in Tabe IV on page 8!


Last edited by gone-ot; 06-08-2012 at 02:17 PM..
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to gone-ot For This Useful Post:
aerohead (06-09-2012)
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 06-08-2012, 02:34 PM   #2 (permalink)
Moderate your Moderation.
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 8,919

Pasta - '96 Volkswagen Passat TDi
90 day: 45.22 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,369
Thanked 430 Times in 353 Posts
I don't have time to read the whole paper, but those numbers sure are significant.

I'll be revisiting this when I have more time to figure out the configuration of the car.
__________________
"¿ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"

  Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2012, 03:45 PM   #3 (permalink)
UFO
Master EcoModder
 
UFO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 1,300

Colorado - '17 Chevrolet Colorado 4x4 LT
90 day: 23.07 mpg (US)
Thanks: 315
Thanked 179 Times in 138 Posts
Diesels rock, even in a Pinto.
__________________
I'm not coasting, I'm shifting slowly.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2012, 04:21 PM   #4 (permalink)
EtOH
 
Allch Chcar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: North Coast, California
Posts: 429

Cordelia - '15 Mazda Mazda3 i Sport
90 day: 37.83 mpg (US)
Thanks: 72
Thanked 35 Times in 26 Posts
0-60mph in 22.5 seconds with the Diesel Pinto vs the VW Rabbit Diesel with 17.5 seconds. But 63 MPG vs 45 MPG.
The OD was only good for a 5% improvement(63 vs 60 MPG).

They mention several times that the gearing and tall rear tires drastically affected the acceleration and handling though. No doubt a production version would have had shorter rear tires and gearing.
__________________
-Allch Chcar

  Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2012, 04:30 PM   #5 (permalink)
...beats walking...
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: .
Posts: 6,190
Thanks: 179
Thanked 1,525 Times in 1,126 Posts
HINT -- "...reading between the lines..." one can get general ideas of 'how much' various "changes" might affect fuel economy -- EPA did the "testing" all we have to do is do the "trying."
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to gone-ot For This Useful Post:
aerohead (06-09-2012)
Old 06-08-2012, 07:13 PM   #6 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
redneck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: SC Lowcountry
Posts: 1,795

Geo XL1 - '94 Geo Metro
Team Metro
Boat tails and more mods
90 day: 72.22 mpg (US)

Big, Bad & Flat - '01 Dodge Ram 3500 SLT
Team Cummins
90 day: 21.13 mpg (US)
Thanks: 226
Thanked 1,353 Times in 711 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Tele man View Post
HINT -- "...reading between the lines..." one can get general ideas of 'how much' various "changes" might affect fuel economy -- EPA did the "testing" all we have to do is do the "trying."
Good eyes...

Like you said, they already did the testing.

I just happen to have a 1974 Chevy C10 that was retro fitted with the same diesel engine except it is a 6cy. 92hp.

I haven't driven it in a while, 2-3 yrs. It just sits in the garage. lol

From what I remember it got 19 hwy,22 city.

It has a 4 speed manual, don't remember the rear end ratio. But, as it is a 4000 rpm engine it was screaming pretty good on the highway, hence the reversal on the mpg figures. I have a 5 speed IROC tranny waiting to go in. It has a 30% overdrive and should help bring down the rpm's for better fuel effiency.

Too many projects, not enough time.

>
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2012, 08:14 PM   #7 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
mechman600's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Langley, BC
Posts: 1,228

Fusion - '16 Ford Fusion Hybrid SE
Thanks: 190
Thanked 275 Times in 168 Posts
Chrysler-Nissan diesel. Woah. I hadn't heard of that till right now. I am too young for that, I guess. A quick Google search revealed that I have been missing out on something big. Thanks, Old Tele man.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2012, 08:41 PM   #8 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,927
Thanks: 877
Thanked 2,024 Times in 1,304 Posts
Compare Old and New MPG Estimates

I wonder how that would compare to the 84 Sentra diesel. I have seen a Nissan 6 cylinder diesel in an International Scout, sweet little setup. I think it was 2.4 liters. The Sentra was 1.7 liters, but I'm sure it did not have the Pinto's overall final drive ratio of under 2 to 1. They put diesels in the original Maximas (RWD). Also some of the 720 Pickups.

I know the Sentra engine would rev to 5k RPM. The car was very peppy and light, original EPA highway at 56 MPG. Remember they were running them slower that the current EPA.

Saw an 83 Maxima diesel at the dealership with 864,000 miles on the original engine. Wouldn't start cold due to low compression. The owner drove it to that mileage in 9 years.

regards
Mech
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2012, 10:54 PM   #9 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: los angeles, ca
Posts: 151
Thanks: 2
Thanked 19 Times in 12 Posts
I got almost 60mpg with my Chevette, just couldn't quite crack it. But 37.5rwhp at the tires is less than some of the Quads that my buddies have!
__________________
1989 Dodge Diesel 972rwhp, 27mpg.
1971 Nova tubbed, solid cam 355 w/nitrous, 8mpg (sorry).
1960 Nash DIY Hybrid Project
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2012, 09:05 AM   #10 (permalink)
...beats walking...
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: .
Posts: 6,190
Thanks: 179
Thanked 1,525 Times in 1,126 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by JQmile View Post
I got almost 60mpg with my Chevette, just couldn't quite crack it. But 37.5rwhp at the tires is less than some of the Quads that my buddies have!
...two things to note: (a) the National Speed Limit back then was 55 MPH and (b) at 55 MPH the typical small car needs only about 10-15 HP to maintain that speed.

...I, too, briefly owned a '81 Chevette with the Izusu NA diesel engine.

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com