So it's looking like 9:1 is the worst AF mixture you can have without flooding. With that being said does that translate straight into fuel consumption? In other words if ideal (stock) is for the most part 14.7:1 would a 9:1 A/F mixture be using 38% more fuel at any given time? Let's assume normal operation and look strictly at A/F ratios and not driving styles.
If the decrease in A/F ratio is more or less translated into fuel consumption then it looks like the worst fuel consumption in any given scenario is roughly 38%. Anything beyond that and it would have to be a fuel leak at that point. Does this sound correct?
|