[mwebb]

"EDIT: We didn't attach an OBD reader to the car... but there was little need and no time to do a comprehensive test... it's a relatively simple car with a single cat that doesn't meet US or Euro emissions standards, so any computer chicanery is happening due to what's going on at the MAP and not the O2 sensor... especially since we weren't running it in closed-loop on the dyno (all WOT runs).
"

very pretty
but you have not attributed any values to any of the pretty little lines on your graphs which may or may not be related to the blarney you are posting -

so
you follow the
if you can not dazzle them with brilliance , baffle them with BS .

the alleged test mule is not in "closed loop" and meets no EOBD or OBD2 standards as such - how do you suppose this has anything at all to do with what you imply ?
it does not .
try again
no more BS


you do not need a dyno in fact for real cars driven on the street
dynos do not and cannot reflect real conditions - like this - see calculated load
if you do something / anything to improve this exact system on this exact car - the calculated load value will increase when driven under the same conditions shown in this screen cap

you claim x% at wot
- your claim would be reflected or disproved by calculated load
show me