View Single Post
Old 08-21-2012, 02:10 PM   #130 (permalink)
jamesqf
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 5,209
Thanks: 225
Thanked 811 Times in 594 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by California98Civic View Post
And to evaluate the safety of nuclear energy for humans without regard to the larger ecological context that sustains human life is completely unacceptably inadequate.
I completely agree! But once again, I have to refer you to the great base of information which shows that the ecosystems of the Chernobyl exclusion zone (the so-called "Dead Zone", though it's anything but) are far, far healthier than they were before the accident.

You also need to consider that shutting down a nuclear plant will mean that much more coal will be strip-mined, natural gas extracted by fracking, wild rivers dammed to produce hydroelectric power, or even miles of desert ecosystem destroyed for solar plants.
  Reply With Quote