View Single Post
Old 08-29-2012, 09:58 AM   #10 (permalink)
arcosine
Master Ecomadman
 
arcosine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Chicago area
Posts: 1,156

sc1 - '98 saturn sc1
Team Saturn
90 day: 43.17 mpg (US)

Airplane Bike - '11 home built Carp line Tour

rans - '97 rans tailwind

tractor - '66 International Cub cadet 129

2002 Space Odyssey - '02 Honda Odyssey EX-L
90 day: 28.25 mpg (US)

red bug - '00 VW beetle TDI

big tractor - '66 ford 3400

red vw - '00 VW new beetle TDI
90 day: 58.42 mpg (US)

RV - '88 Winnebago LeSharo
90 day: 16.67 mpg (US)
Thanks: 20
Thanked 337 Times in 227 Posts
He is not taking into account the lower manifold vacuum due to the 2 active cylinders working harder to keep up, the engine would be at full throttle twice as long with half the cylinders. I would go as far to say that under load it would have half the manifold vacuum and thus half the pumping loss. Of course if the valves were deactivated then it would have half the vacuum and half the displacement for 1/4 the pumping loss of a full engine.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Weather Spotter View Post
so all that comes down to, without closing the valves its not worth it, the pumping losses will negate most (all) of the gas savings.

Bummer!
__________________
- Tony

  Reply With Quote