View Single Post
Old 09-08-2012, 06:13 PM   #15 (permalink)
redpoint5
Human Environmentalist
 
redpoint5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,895

Acura TSX - '06 Acura TSX
90 day: 24.19 mpg (US)

Lafawnda - CBR600 - '01 Honda CBR600 F4i
90 day: 47.32 mpg (US)

Big Yeller - Dodge/Cummins - '98 Dodge Ram 2500 base
90 day: 21.82 mpg (US)

Chevy ZR-2 - '03 Chevrolet S10 ZR2
90 day: 17.14 mpg (US)

Model Y - '24 Tesla Y LR AWD

Pacifica Hybrid - '21 Chrysler Pacifica Hybrid
90 day: 38.47 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,346
Thanked 4,501 Times in 3,462 Posts
Most items marketed as "green" are either barely better for the environment, or actually worse. Profit motivates everyone to slap a green label on something if they can get away with it. People pay the higher prices to either feel less guilty about the fact that living involves consumption, or to be counted among the elite planet savers of the world.

Take local, organic food for instance. It takes several fold more land to farm without pesticides and fertilizers, especially when growing something not adapted for the region. Plus, it takes way more fuel to move many small trucks a short distance to a local market than to move 1 big ship full of food a long distance. These small food operations are almost never better for the environment.

Generally, if something costs more than a comparable product, then it takes more inputs (resources) to produce. This is why purchasing decisions based on price are often the true "green" option.
__________________
Gas and Electric Vehicle Cost of Ownership Calculator







Give me absolute safety, or give me death!
  Reply With Quote