View Single Post
Old 09-11-2012, 06:20 PM   #12 (permalink)
JohnAh
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Vallentuna, Sweden
Posts: 129

Phantom Blot (Spökplumpen in swedish) - '75 Saab 96 V4
90 day: 52.77 mpg (US)
Thanks: 17
Thanked 55 Times in 30 Posts
About 15-20 years ago I saw a TV-documentary about an australian company named Orbital Engine that was said to be close to mass production of a 3-cyl two-stroker with better fuel economy and lower exhaust emissions than a four-stroke of same date! These engines had a delayed direct injection of fuel similar to that in the above described marine V6. It also had lubrication in a closed circuit like in a 4-stroke. Cylinder scavenge was done by a separate pump/compressor instead of crankcase/pistons.

From what I know this is not very different from many two-stroke diesels except that they often have exhaust valves and a camshaft. Once adding a camshaft and some valves to a two-stroker I see no reason not to make it a four-stroker instead. Well... Perhaps the 2-T design can deliver more even and higher torque and power at lower speed compared to a 4-stroke of the same displacement. (firing twice as often)
  Reply With Quote