View Single Post
Old 09-15-2012, 03:51 PM   #2 (permalink)
redpoint5
Human Environmentalist
 
redpoint5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,479

Acura TSX - '06 Acura TSX
90 day: 24.19 mpg (US)

Lafawnda - CBR600 - '01 Honda CBR600 F4i
90 day: 47.32 mpg (US)

Big Yeller - Dodge/Cummins - '98 Dodge Ram 2500 base
90 day: 21.82 mpg (US)

Chevy ZR-2 - '03 Chevrolet S10 ZR2
90 day: 17.14 mpg (US)

Model Y - '24 Tesla Y LR AWD
Thanks: 4,218
Thanked 4,393 Times in 3,366 Posts
I like the thought, but would be unwilling to give up that other 25% just to gain the extra resolution. I see no reason this wouldn't work though. The bigger question is whether the effort will result in measurable fuel economy improvements. I'd like to see you test it.

In high school, I built an electric "car" that was a reverse trike design made of aluminum and custom built bicycle wheels. This was entered into the PGE (Portland General Electric) sponsored 1hr endurance races against other schools. I mention this because I thought about how difficult throttle control was on a bumpy road combined with the imprecision of a shoe-covered foot. I designed the throttle into the steering mechanism to help isolate bumps and increase precision. The design resembled the handle of a pull-starter and was operated by placing the wood-carved handle between the index and middle fingers and pulling towards the driver. This actuated the spring-loaded POT.
__________________
Gas and Electric Vehicle Cost of Ownership Calculator







Give me absolute safety, or give me death!
  Reply With Quote