Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 09-15-2012, 04:35 PM   #1 (permalink)
aero guerrilla
 
Piwoslaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Posts: 3,753

Svietlana II - '13 Peugeot 308SW e-HDI 6sp
90 day: 58.1 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,339
Thanked 751 Times in 477 Posts
Re-scaling gas pedal (for better resolution)?

My car has a fly-by-wire gas pedal, with a potentiometer mounted directly on the pedal. Some slightly older cars still have a cable going into the engine bay and turning a pot there. Either way, the pedal's position is translated into an electrical resistance which the ECU reads to know how much the driver wants to accelerate.

Since I keep an eye on the ScanGauge to adjust acceleration, I never floor the go pedal, in fact I hardly ever press it farther then 60-70% of its total travel distance.

On the other hand, the slightest, barely noticible microchange in the pedal's position can change engine load by a lot, for example barely increasing the pressure on the gas pedal can change engine load from 55% to 90%.

So this got me thinking if I could rescale the pedal's potentiometer so that the max value is the resistance when the pedal would normally be pressed 75% of the way. This would allow better resolution, making it easier to stay at the optimal load.

What do you think?

__________________
e·co·mod·ding: the art of turning vehicles into what they should be

What matters is where you're going, not how fast.

"... we humans tend to screw up everything that's good enough as it is...or everything that we're attracted to, we love to go and defile it." - Chris Cornell


[Old] Piwoslaw's Peugeot 307sw modding thread
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 09-15-2012, 04:51 PM   #2 (permalink)
Human Environmentalist
 
redpoint5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,819

Acura TSX - '06 Acura TSX
90 day: 24.19 mpg (US)

Lafawnda - CBR600 - '01 Honda CBR600 F4i
90 day: 47.32 mpg (US)

Big Yeller - Dodge/Cummins - '98 Dodge Ram 2500 base
90 day: 21.82 mpg (US)

Chevy ZR-2 - '03 Chevrolet S10 ZR2
90 day: 17.14 mpg (US)

Model Y - '24 Tesla Y LR AWD

Pacifica Hybrid - '21 Chrysler Pacifica Hybrid
90 day: 43.3 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,327
Thanked 4,480 Times in 3,445 Posts
I like the thought, but would be unwilling to give up that other 25% just to gain the extra resolution. I see no reason this wouldn't work though. The bigger question is whether the effort will result in measurable fuel economy improvements. I'd like to see you test it.

In high school, I built an electric "car" that was a reverse trike design made of aluminum and custom built bicycle wheels. This was entered into the PGE (Portland General Electric) sponsored 1hr endurance races against other schools. I mention this because I thought about how difficult throttle control was on a bumpy road combined with the imprecision of a shoe-covered foot. I designed the throttle into the steering mechanism to help isolate bumps and increase precision. The design resembled the handle of a pull-starter and was operated by placing the wood-carved handle between the index and middle fingers and pulling towards the driver. This actuated the spring-loaded POT.
__________________
Gas and Electric Vehicle Cost of Ownership Calculator







Give me absolute safety, or give me death!
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2012, 06:25 PM   #3 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Silly-Con Valley
Posts: 1,479
Thanks: 201
Thanked 262 Times in 199 Posts
There are electronic devices out there that will modify the signal of the throttle pedal for you. I think "Sprint Booster" is one? They are generally intended to give you a quicker response, which is the opposite of what you want, but you may be able to program them or find a way to modify them so that the top 20% of the signal happens only at the very end of travel. That would give you the option to use WOT in the rare instance you actually need to.

-soD
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2012, 01:31 AM   #4 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: winterpeg, manisnowba
Posts: 211

clank - '99 jeep tj sport
90 day: 17.32 mpg (US)
Thanks: 9
Thanked 18 Times in 18 Posts
wouldn't putting a variable resistor in series (or parallel) help for fine tuning.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2012, 02:35 AM   #5 (permalink)
aero guerrilla
 
Piwoslaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Posts: 3,753

Svietlana II - '13 Peugeot 308SW e-HDI 6sp
90 day: 58.1 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,339
Thanked 751 Times in 477 Posts
The thing is that I can live without the last 25% of travel without even noticing. I've noted (and Euromodder, who has the same engine) that in most situations max acceleration is within the first 30-50% of pressing the gas pedal, any more and at best more fuel is used, but without more acceleration.
A none-linear resistor would be great, but not in my case, as 80% engine load is sometimes seen with the pedal pressed halfway, and sometimes only 10-15%.

I have thought about a hand operated lever on the steering wheel (a few ecomodders have done this, but with a bicycle gear shifter operating the throttle cable), or at least a switch which would let me choose between stock and improved resolution, but I'm still wondering whether I'll do this mod. If I actually go into this, then I might just limit the max engine load to 80%, or to its best BSFC.
__________________
e·co·mod·ding: the art of turning vehicles into what they should be

What matters is where you're going, not how fast.

"... we humans tend to screw up everything that's good enough as it is...or everything that we're attracted to, we love to go and defile it." - Chris Cornell


[Old] Piwoslaw's Peugeot 307sw modding thread
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2012, 04:49 AM   #6 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: United States
Posts: 1,756

spyder2 - '00 Toyota MR2 Spyder
Thanks: 104
Thanked 407 Times in 312 Posts
So I'm pretty sure the throttle maps are meant to imitate the more intuitive aspects of a cable throttle (on the highway for example I feel like cable throttle makes you step a lot more to get more speed, because you're "locally" directly controlling airflow and thus power, not torque. The one throttle map I've seen is for the BRZ/FRS and it basically almost all of the change in commanded torque happens in the middle third of pedal travel. Pushing the pedal to the metal doesn't add nearly as much power as pushing from fully lifted to halfwayish.

I think the e-throttle maps are one of the more easily modified things when reflashing an ECU, but not sure. Should be pretty easy to give it a gentler torque ramp up.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2012, 11:02 AM   #7 (permalink)
ron
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: slo county ca.
Posts: 277

double eagles - '99 Dodge ram slt
Team Cummins
90 day: 19.48 mpg (US)
Thanks: 24
Thanked 17 Times in 16 Posts
I'll be interested to see how this works ,my daily driver is also hard to control for best FE I find that if I drive by ear (i can hear when the engine is loaded)and back off a bit I get to work just as fast and save fuel.

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com