View Single Post
Old 09-17-2012, 11:55 PM   #30 (permalink)
MetroMPG
Batman Junior
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 21,770

Blackfly - '98 Geo Metro
Team Metro
Last 3: 70.09 mpg (US)

MPGiata - '90 Mazda Miata
90 day: 53.56 mpg (US)

Winter beater Metro - '00 Chevrolet Metro
90 day: 61.98 mpg (US)

Fancy Metro - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage top spec
90 day: 58.72 mpg (US)

Even Fancier Metro - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage top spec
90 day: 66.29 mpg (US)
Thanks: 3,481
Thanked 6,282 Times in 3,251 Posts
Quote:
-- SOMETHING IS DRASTICALLY WRONG --
This isn't rocket science. To start with, the 2012 4.0L V6 has 108 more horsepower than the 3.0L V6 in the 1992 truck: 261 vs 153 (assuming I got the trims right).

Is it reasonable to expect 108 more horsepower to come with no fuel economy penalty? To actually have better fuel economy?

Feel free to carry on the investigation re: vehicle weight, transmission differences & aerodynamics (frontal area is likely greater).
__________________
Latest mods: 3-cylinder Mitsubishi Mirage. EcoMods now in progress...
Ecodriving test:
Manual vs. automatic transmission MPG showdown



EcoModder
has launched a forum for the efficient new Mitsubishi Mirage
www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote