Quote:
Originally Posted by orion411
This guys negative pressure supercharger probably beats your turbodiesel in efficiency, power and cleanliness.
|
Thats good for them.
Here is the only problem with that:
Negative super charging can only boost volumetric efficiency up to about 110% to no more than 120%.
My diesel with the turbo charger runs at least 170% volume metric efficiency.
I know all about this phenomenon, I have been studying it since 2004.
Here: Intake runner design, short vs. long - Third Generation F-Body Message Boards
And here:
Intake runner design, short vs. long. w/pic - CamaroZ28.Com Message Board
My theorys stand up to peer review.
We did a 2012 revisit on super V.E. on our forum.
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...els-23234.html
And my stuff doesn't get put in the unicorn corral by the mods and I provide proof of my claims.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
|