View Single Post
Old 11-06-2012, 11:46 AM   #44 (permalink)
mcrews
Master EcoModder
 
mcrews's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,523

The Q Sold - '02 Infiniti Q45 Sport
90 day: 23.08 mpg (US)

blackie - '14 nissan altima sv
Thanks: 2,203
Thanked 663 Times in 478 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by ctgottapee View Post
This result still baffles me as it seems to go against what the car manufacturers are doing, especially those who use adaptive systems to lower ride height at highway cruising speeds.

I was planning on going on a tad smaller tires, due to having already large tires as standard but now I'm wondering...

You are probably baffled because there are two different concepts.
1. Lowering a car to achieve aero is NOT done by reducing the tire size. (Because they know reducing the tire size hurts the gearing) Cars are lowered by lowering the suspension.
2. reducing tire size INCREASES the rpms of the engine. That increases gas consumption.
3. THe SLIGHT increase in height is more than offset by the deceased rmps of the engine at highway speeds.

There are numerous threads on this topic where you can get a fuller understanding.
__________________
MetroMPG: "Get the MPG gauge - it turns driving into a fuel & money saving game."

ECO MODS PERFORMED:
First: ScangaugeII
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...eii-23306.html

Second: Grille Block
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...e-10912-2.html

Third: Full underbelly pan
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...q45-11402.html

Fourth: rear skirts and 30.4mpg on trip!
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...tml#post247938
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to mcrews For This Useful Post:
mchlbk (11-07-2012)