View Single Post
Old 11-14-2012, 01:18 PM   #59 (permalink)
elhigh
Master Novice
 
elhigh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: SE USA - East Tennessee
Posts: 2,314

Josie - '87 Toyota Pickup
90 day: 29.5 mpg (US)

Felicia - '09 Toyota Prius Base
90 day: 52.44 mpg (US)
Thanks: 427
Thanked 616 Times in 450 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ryland View Post
How about filling your heat storage tank with something like paraffin wax instead of water then having a closed coil of tubing in the wax, as I understand it paraffin wax holds a lot more heat in the phase change of going from a solid to a liquid and the temps that you are looking at seem about right for wax heat storage.
That crossed my mind when I saw the subject line. Wax is generally lighter than water, but I don't think the weight savings would be significant. The big benefit here though would be getting that heat of fusion for some serious capacity. I don't know how that would compare with the mass of water you're carrying.

I am rapidly getting beyond my knowledge here, and if I try to dig too deeply into the subject, I will embarrass myself and annoy you with my ignorance.

I think VW did a concept of this some years back, but I think they used something called Glauber's salt.

The energy stored is comparable but the wax's performance envelope is at a higher temperature. Glauber's salt does its thing about 32 deg. C. If you wanted to give up more space and tote around more weight, you could have a two-stage system that quickly brought your engine up to near operating temperature.
__________________




Lead or follow. Either is fine.
  Reply With Quote