View Single Post
Old 12-19-2012, 06:43 PM   #541 (permalink)
RustyLugNut
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 982
Thanks: 271
Thanked 385 Times in 259 Posts
Giberish to you because you are assuming combustion is simple.

Quote:
Originally Posted by UFO View Post
The Nasa study demonstrated an efficiency gain of 3% with bottled H2 and a flow rate substantially higher than a little bubble bottle. You cannot make the argument for a 30% efficiency for on-board hydrogen generation that will produce a mileage improvement. You need over-unity to balance the energy inputs. Sorry, all your suppositions about only a 140 watt input, cylinder pressure increase and crank angles is just gibberish.
It is not. It has pathways that can be manipulated. Hydrogen augmentation is just one of them.

And that is why I am willing to build and show proof of concept. I have selectively distributed the idea in paper to peers in academia and in the profession of combustion and they agree the idea has merit. My gibberish is well understood there.

  Reply With Quote