Thread: Lock your port?
View Single Post
Old 06-16-2013, 09:33 PM   #6 (permalink)
kir_kenix
kir_kenix
 
kir_kenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Emerson, Ne
Posts: 207

1997 Chevy s10 - '97 Chevy S10 WT
Pickups
90 day: 32.71 mpg (US)

1997 Ford Escort - '97 Ford Escort LX
Team Ford
Last 3: 32.29 mpg (US)

Razz - '97 Yamaha Razz
90 day: 109.57 mpg (US)

2004 Ford F250 - '04 Ford F250 XLT
90 day: 16.32 mpg (US)

2000 S10 4.3 - '00 Chevrolet S10 W/T
Pickups
90 day: 19.4 mpg (US)

2010 corilla - '10 Toyota Corolla LE
90 day: 32.82 mpg (US)

'Yota - '22 Toyota Rav4 LE
90 day: 37.41 mpg (US)
Thanks: 15
Thanked 30 Times in 19 Posts
We actually talked about this in an anti-terrorism briefing that was put on by the Nebraska TAG. It was a brainstorming session where we considered many different forms of terrorism/cyber terrorism. Someone at the conference was a GM technician, and he basically said that it was basically impossible to remotely damage/reprogram any of the ECU's currently in use. He said there would be a way bigger/realistic chance of something like OnStar getting hacked and inconveniencing people for a short period of time. I think this topic never made it to the "big board" that was discussed later on.
  Reply With Quote