View Single Post
Old 08-14-2013, 01:46 AM   #109 (permalink)
Frank Lee
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
Separate liner vs as cast cyl: more complicated and expensive to manufacture.

I like al engines in some applications, like motorcycles and chainsaws. But where the modest weight differences don't really matter I think fe has more pros than cons.

If my Tempo's cast iron lump was al and saved what- 50 lbs?- that would be a 1.8% reduction in total weight. I might be able to notice the weight loss over the front end with my power steering delete, but if that handling difference was worth the effort I could keep the fe engine, put the batt in the trunk, and end up in about the same place.

My Snapper rider has the al bore B&S and it uses more oil than the Valdez. Can you hone the cylinder and re-ring? No. Can you bore it? No. Not unless you bore it enough to put a proper iron sleeve in... $$$ while overbore in a fe block + oversize piston is cheap in comparison. Sure wish that one was fe.
__________________



Last edited by Frank Lee; 08-14-2013 at 03:21 AM..
  Reply With Quote