View Single Post
Old 10-04-2013, 11:56 AM   #140 (permalink)
MetroMPG
Batman Junior
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,521

Blackfly - '98 Geo Metro
Team Metro
Last 3: 70.09 mpg (US)

MPGiata - '90 Mazda Miata
90 day: 52.71 mpg (US)

Even Fancier Metro - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage top spec
90 day: 70.75 mpg (US)

Appliance car - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage ES (base)
90 day: 52.48 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,077
Thanked 6,965 Times in 3,606 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Xist View Post
That is based on the amount that you drive or someone else?
HA! True. No, would take me about 35 years to pay off the CVT premium.

Actually, the figures for that calc are in the link: it's based on 15k miles/yr, fuel at $3.61 (if memory serves.)

Quote:
Why would they gear their car to use such high RPM on the highway? [...] CVTs are more efficient than normal automatics, but the only reason that they are more efficient than manuals is because those were made even less efficient!
Give this man a prize.

For some reason, most automakers have decided that once the driver shifts into top gear, said driver is incapable of downshifting for passing or climbing. Therefore, give said driver excessive engine RPM.

Mitsu must be made to see the error of their ways. I should start a petition.
__________________
Project MPGiata! Mods for getting 50+ MPG from a 1990 Miata
Honda mods: Ecomodding my $800 Honda Fit 5-speed beater
Mitsu mods: 70 MPG in my ecomodded, dirt cheap, 3-cylinder Mirage.
Ecodriving test: Manual vs. automatic transmission MPG showdown



EcoModder
has launched a forum for the efficient new Mitsubishi Mirage
www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to MetroMPG For This Useful Post:
night9 (10-04-2013), niky (10-05-2013), PaleMelanesian (10-04-2013)