View Single Post
Old 11-18-2013, 06:28 PM   #16 (permalink)
MetroMPG
Batman Junior
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,535

Blackfly - '98 Geo Metro
Team Metro
Last 3: 70.09 mpg (US)

MPGiata - '90 Mazda Miata
90 day: 54.46 mpg (US)

Appliance car Mirage - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage ES (base)
90 day: 57.73 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,082
Thanked 6,982 Times in 3,615 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by bikenfool View Post
Sure, but let say you slow down your constant speed target just a little bit, so the time to destination is the same with either method. Then you will use more on the climb, but use less the rest of the time.
I think you can still beat constant speed (cruise control style) driving with DWL, and still have the same time to destination. The lower average ascending speed of DWL is offset by the higher than average speed by the bottom of the descent. (I'm assuming that in the constant speed approach, there is higher manifold vacuum to hold speed on the downhill part.)

Quote:
If the hill is steep enuf you can coast.
True. And that's more efficient because now we're effectively talking about pulse & glide.
__________________
Project MPGiata! Mods for getting 50+ MPG from a 1990 Miata
Honda mods: Ecomodding my $800 Honda Fit 5-speed beater
Mitsu mods: 70 MPG in my ecomodded, dirt cheap, 3-cylinder Mirage.
Ecodriving test: Manual vs. automatic transmission MPG showdown



EcoModder
has launched a forum for the efficient new Mitsubishi Mirage
www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote