View Single Post
Old 11-26-2013, 01:10 PM   #70 (permalink)
elhigh
Master Novice
 
elhigh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: SE USA - East Tennessee
Posts: 2,314

Josie - '87 Toyota Pickup
90 day: 29.5 mpg (US)

Felicia - '09 Toyota Prius Base
90 day: 52.44 mpg (US)
Thanks: 427
Thanked 616 Times in 450 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by bikenfool View Post
I thought it was a pretty good Cd for a van. Is there a good reason to fear FWD in a big van? I think it's mostly lack of experience with that design.
If you aren't moving heavy stuff, then FWD is a better choice all around. Lighter cargo is less likely to go in at a loading dock, so having a lower load floor is better for loading/unloading. It eliminates a lot of weight and chassis height by removing RWD components. Loading at a cargo dock isn't out of the question either; many (by no means all) docks are equipped with levelers that can take up up to 12" of truck/dock height discrepancy. Usually not that much though.

Assuming FWD is lighter duty is just silly. Yes, there are lots of moving parts. But European manufacturers have been building FWD vans for decades and I reckon they've got a pretty good handle on how to make them hold up under a load. Now if we can just adjust American prejudices, we've got it made.
__________________




Lead or follow. Either is fine.
  Reply With Quote