View Single Post
Old 02-04-2014, 11:55 AM   #58 (permalink)
MetroMPG
Batman Junior
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,532

Blackfly - '98 Geo Metro
Team Metro
Last 3: 70.09 mpg (US)

MPGiata - '90 Mazda Miata
90 day: 54.46 mpg (US)

Even Fancier Metro - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage top spec
90 day: 70.75 mpg (US)

Appliance car Mirage - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage ES (base)
90 day: 62.14 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,082
Thanked 6,978 Times in 3,613 Posts
If you were only "so so" on the manual car, I predict you'll not like the CVT. There seems to be a clear divide on reviews of the 5MT vs. the CVT in North America, at least.

I wish, wish, wish the 1.0L were available here. We've got a poll running on MirageForum, and more respondents (even here on the power-hungry continent) are saying they would have chosen the 1.0 over the 1.2, even without trying it first. The difference is about 7% better fuel economy, ~9% less horsepower. Self-selecting sample, of cours.e

EDIT PS: the non-auto-resetting MPG gauge option is in the Asian cars as well as the North American ones. I'm pretty sure it's a feature in the Euro/UK cars too.
__________________
Project MPGiata! Mods for getting 50+ MPG from a 1990 Miata
Honda mods: Ecomodding my $800 Honda Fit 5-speed beater
Mitsu mods: 70 MPG in my ecomodded, dirt cheap, 3-cylinder Mirage.
Ecodriving test: Manual vs. automatic transmission MPG showdown



EcoModder
has launched a forum for the efficient new Mitsubishi Mirage
www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote