View Single Post
Old 03-12-2014, 05:03 AM   #14 (permalink)
redpoint5
Human Environmentalist
 
redpoint5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,946

Acura TSX - '06 Acura TSX
90 day: 24.19 mpg (US)

Lafawnda - CBR600 - '01 Honda CBR600 F4i
90 day: 47.32 mpg (US)

Big Yeller - Dodge/Cummins - '98 Dodge Ram 2500 base
90 day: 21.82 mpg (US)

Chevy ZR-2 - '03 Chevrolet S10 ZR2
90 day: 17.14 mpg (US)

Model Y - '24 Tesla Y LR AWD

Pacifica Hybrid - '21 Chrysler Pacifica Hybrid
90 day: 38.47 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,359
Thanked 4,515 Times in 3,473 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jyden View Post
If we assume, that it can produce 28 kWh a year...
Can we assume your car will use the 28 kWh that is your setup would be capable of producing? When parked, your car would only utilize a fraction of the 28 available solar watts, maybe half a watt at best on a fully charged battery. You would have to run the battery down to utilize the charging capability of the panel. The problem is, lead acid batteries don't like to be discharged, and any marginal savings you would have from solar charging would be more than made up for by reduced battery life. As you point out, it's possible to run the battery down and then have something block the PV from recharging it.

Effort would be better spent improving the charge/discharge system by cleaning up terminals and installing a battery technology that is better than 50% efficient (lead acid).
__________________
Gas and Electric Vehicle Cost of Ownership Calculator







Give me absolute safety, or give me death!
  Reply With Quote