03-11-2014, 07:51 PM
|
#11 (permalink)
|
EcoMod Proof of Concept
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Chilliwack B.C. CANADA
Posts: 245
Thanks: 81
Thanked 85 Times in 45 Posts
|
I too have a 40 watt panel .. mines inside the car on top of the folded back seat, not the most efficient place but anything it does is free to my MPG.
I have the plan to put it on the roof and raise the roof around it via coroplast like this http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...tml#post314105
Only building it directly into either the kamback or future boatail.
__________________
2000 Insight MT 106K Citrus A/C
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
03-11-2014, 08:08 PM
|
#12 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Denmark, Europe
Posts: 338
Thanks: 138
Thanked 42 Times in 35 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by WD40
I too have a 40 watt panel .. mines inside the car on top of the folded back seat, not the most efficient place but anything it does is free to my MPG.
I have the plan to put it on the roof and raise the roof around it via coroplast like this http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...tml#post314105
Only building it directly into either the kamback or future boatail.
|
Go for a flexible panel. Lightwight and can be glued on to the roof. Framed panels are to heavy and not very areo.
|
|
|
03-11-2014, 10:41 PM
|
#13 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maynard, MA Eaarth
Posts: 7,908
Thanks: 3,475
Thanked 2,952 Times in 1,845 Posts
|
It is 8.9kWh / liter of gasoline. 33.7kWh/gal x 0.26417205 = 8.902598085
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to NeilBlanchard For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-12-2014, 05:03 AM
|
#14 (permalink)
|
Human Environmentalist
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,819
Thanks: 4,327
Thanked 4,480 Times in 3,445 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jyden
If we assume, that it can produce 28 kWh a year...
|
Can we assume your car will use the 28 kWh that is your setup would be capable of producing? When parked, your car would only utilize a fraction of the 28 available solar watts, maybe half a watt at best on a fully charged battery. You would have to run the battery down to utilize the charging capability of the panel. The problem is, lead acid batteries don't like to be discharged, and any marginal savings you would have from solar charging would be more than made up for by reduced battery life. As you point out, it's possible to run the battery down and then have something block the PV from recharging it.
Effort would be better spent improving the charge/discharge system by cleaning up terminals and installing a battery technology that is better than 50% efficient (lead acid).
|
|
|
03-12-2014, 09:59 PM
|
#15 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: May 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 2,643
Thanks: 1,502
Thanked 279 Times in 229 Posts
|
This is something Ive wanted to try. I did win a few small 5 and 10 watt framed panels online and first thought was to incorporate them into a wing.
Plan B was that an 85 watt panel I had could be attached and used as a wing. Turns out it was like a few inches too big. Plan B was to mount the panel to the hood high center near the windshield or even on the dash behind the windshield away from the air bags.
Then I got to thinking maybe I should wire 2 5 watt panels in serial to ensure it will charge even in low light and that 10 watts would not be enough to over charge or damage a group 51 battery. I got a mppt controller, but its not waterproof, so it would need to mount inside and then I had to run wires, etc.
So, they sit in a box til I can figure it out or just run with it. May just run with it putting 2 on the hood of the insight in serial and use 3m red double sided tape to mount them. Then use the other panels for the sidekick and mount them in a similar manner. It has a group 24 deep cycle battery.
|
|
|
04-10-2014, 05:22 PM
|
#16 (permalink)
|
Old Retired R&D Dude
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Woburn Mass USA
Posts: 702
Thanks: 10
Thanked 18 Times in 17 Posts
|
PV can be used in a lot of different ways..
That video got me laughing..
But, also made me think maybe I could use one of my PV arrays to top-off the 144V pack in my wife's Prius C..
I've also been considering using 800w of PV power to get rid of some rodents
that are digging a zillion little tunnels under the back lawn..
Like one of those fishing worm /w generator rigs..
But, right now that array (and my tracking array) are busy making hot water..
Yeah, it's crazy I know. But you can actually make a good bit of hot water with PV..
http://i46.photobucket.com/albums/f1...solarfarm2.jpg
Without the PV, the ASHP ( A7 heatpump) would be running everyday, instead of once a week.. Or less..
Yeah, you can use PV for some crazy things.. Just be ready for a barrage of criticism from purist..
__________________
Cheers,
Rich
Current ride: 2014 RAV4 LE AWD (24 MPG)
Wife's Pizza Transporter
|
|
|
04-10-2014, 07:29 PM
|
#17 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Apprentice
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Oxford, UK
Posts: 126
Thanks: 27
Thanked 51 Times in 31 Posts
|
I think solar CELLS could be incorporated into the bodywork of a car with zero drag penalty and almost zero weight penalty. I did some rough calculations a while back (sorry, I must have lost that evelope) and worked out that it was feasible to more or less replace the functionality of an alternator by incorporating about 400w of solar cells. (Or was it 300w?) Solar cells have a life of roughly the same as the life of a vehicle (20 years+?) so building them into the paint layer at manufacture kind of makes sense. Obviously the flatter panels are easier to deal with (roof, bonnet, hood...) but individual cells can be incorporated into curved bodywork far more easily than even 'semi-flexible' ready-made solar panels. (And how thick are solar cells? They weigh almost nothing.)
They could be used to charge a deep cycle battery which in turn charges the starter batttery (or starter super capacitor?) via a DC/DC converter/charger. That way the starter battery stays fully charged all the time and the 'donor' battery can be at any state of charge between flat and full, depending on sunshine levels, levels of use, length of journey, the time since last mains plug-in, etc.
I say, "more or less replace the alternator". I don't think you can do without it completely if you still want to be able to drive unlimited distances at night, but it would remain switched off for 90% of the time or more for most people. The alternator could then be thought of as a back-up generator, and could perhaps be coupled via a clutch pulley such as is used to engage an air conditioning compressor.
I'm currently working on a 'donor battery' system for a 2002 diesel Golf (the battery or batteries to reside in the spare wheel well) and although I haven't got any immediate plans to use solar cells for charging, and will be relying on a pair of 10A mains chargers for the foreseable future, I do really like the idea of a predominantly solar-powered vehicle electrical system. At some point I may mount a pair of 20w semi-flexible solar panels on the inside of the rear side glass in the load area. (It's an estate/wagon and the driver can never see through those panes anyway.) I'd have one panel charging the starter battery and the other charging the donor battery.
I am currently using a donor battery with a DC/DC converter/charger but haven't got it properly installed yet. (The test battery, converter and the various volt/amp displays are all bundled together in the front passenger footwell like some doomsday device ticking its way towards zero hours. I dread to think what the Police will make of it next time I'm pulled over for driving suspiciously slowly. Hopefully it will all be tucked away safely in the spare wheel well soon.)
I haven't worked out yet quite how to automate the switching, but I reckon the judicious use of voltage sensitive switches could control the whole set-up, including shutting off the converter (at 12.2v?) to protect the donor battery from excessive discharge, and also determining the starter battery voltage at which the alternator finally kicks back in.
At present I have a 90Ah AGM starter battery, charged at night off the mains, and I expect to fit a 110Ah AGM in the rear as a donor. Taking both batteries down to no further than 50% State of Charge, I reckon I'll get between 3.5 and 12 hours driving time depending on time of day/night, raining/not raining, etc. With just the one battery I'm currently getting between 1.5 and 5 hours alternator-free drive time. Not using the alternator seems to have put my overall average mpg up from about 70mpg (Imperial) to about 80mpg.
With a 'donor battery' system, even if the alternator kicks in on a long, rainy, dark night drive, it will never charge the donor battery itself, so a good amount of fuel will still have been saved on that journey, just as on shorter journies.
I think ultimately a small light starter battery or super capacitor for cranking the engine, combined with a large deep-discharge battery (AGM? LiFePo4?) as donor is the way to go, but that would be expensive: I would then need a much more powerful DC/DC converter (30A? 40A?) necessitating the running of dedicated high current wiring, ...and I can't afford a LiFePo4 donor battery.
So I'm compromising and going with the two large AGM batteries - one as starter and one as donor. I'm finding that a little 12A DC/DC converter/charger works really well, as I want to spread the load across both batteries. 12A is so low that I can safely use the existing wiring that goes to the rear 12v power outlet, which is permanently connected to the starter battery and is rated (fused) at 30A. Some days (or nights) the starter battery takes more strain than the donor, and some days the donor battery maintains the starter battery fully charged at between 13v and 14v the whole day, but overall it seems both batteries are working well within their 'comfort zones' for 95% of the time, so both should hopefully last a reasonable number of years.
|
|
|
|