View Single Post
Old 03-17-2014, 12:25 PM   #33 (permalink)
RustyLugNut
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 982
Thanks: 271
Thanked 385 Times in 259 Posts
The original post was for steam engines . . .

Quote:
Originally Posted by P-hack View Post
Point? I dunno, you tell me.

Anyway I think it is worth distinguishing between gas and diesels too. Turbo's seem to be an efficiency penalty on gas engines, while an efficiency boost on diesels.

lower peak bsfc for spark normally aspirated (page 874, fig 15-38)
lower peak bsfc for diesel turbo (page 876, fig 15-40) (plus much better power/weight at improved bsfc)


http://www.rmcet.com/lib/E-Books/Mec...ndamentals.pdf
. . . which was extended to the idea of a partial steam implementation in the exhaust driven turbo charger.

You are now extending the discussion to another area. Maybe a new thread is in order.

But, your reference is interesting in that many people assume that the increased efficiency gained by a diesel with a turbo charger applied can also be found by applying a turbo charger to a gasoline engine ignoring the differences in combustion operation. That is not the case.

Thank you for the link by the way. Heywood is a classic.

Last edited by RustyLugNut; 03-17-2014 at 12:39 PM.. Reason: Additional.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to RustyLugNut For This Useful Post:
Cobb (03-17-2014)