View Single Post
Old 05-20-2014, 02:04 PM   #21 (permalink)
mikeyjd
Master EcoModder
 
mikeyjd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 838

Matchbox - '93 Ford Festiva L
Team Ford
Last 3: 70.16 mpg (US)

Salamander - '99 Chrysler Concorde LXI
Team Dodge
90 day: 30.3 mpg (US)

Urquhart - '97 Toyota Tacoma 4x4 V6 3.4L DLX
Pickups
90 day: 25.81 mpg (US)

Smudge - '98 Toyota Tacoma
90 day: 40.65 mpg (US)

Calebro - '15 Renault Trafic 1.25 dci
90 day: 39.39 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,380
Thanked 209 Times in 155 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Mechanic View Post
Demonstration Vehicles | Clean Automotive Technology | Transportation and Air Quality| US EPA

Look at the demonstration vehicle at the bottom of the linked article. A passenger car with an EPA rating of 80 MPG combined.

In that 198 page document they admitted that the bent axis pump used in the vehicle had serious problems with high speed efficiency. The quote I remember was them asking for a "clean sheet of paper design" for a drive pump-motor that would not suffer the high speed efficiency losses of the bent axis pump they used which ran at prop shaft speed through a regular differential.

That knowledge was the basis of my design which is located in the wheels of the vehicle and not only is much more efficient at high speeds, BUT IT NEVER HAS TO RUN AT HIGH SPEEDS IN THE FIRST PLACE, unless your are talking about 200+ MPH.

regards
Mech
Those demo vehicles show how criminal our current offerings for good fuel economy cars really are. With a full series HHV Diesel Sedan we should have several 100+mpg options available to choose from...

  Reply With Quote