View Single Post
Old 06-15-2014, 05:40 PM   #11 (permalink)
jedi_sol
Master EcoModder
 
jedi_sol's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Tustin, CA
Posts: 929

2013 STi *SOLD* - '13 Subaru Impreza WRX STi
Subaru
Sports Cars
Team Turbocharged!
90 day: 26.59 mpg (US)

1996 Geo Metro *RETIRED from Ecomodding* - '96 Geo Metro Base
90 day: 58.68 mpg (US)
Thanks: 368
Thanked 380 Times in 238 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Axsle View Post
If the air dam is longer/lower at the sides so that the air is diverted around the tires, is that better? Could that help even with a belly pan?
Yes, if the airdam is longer and lower at the sides, it is better because it diverts air away from the tires AND it will not increase your frontal area.

The reason an air dam can help fuel efficiency is by preventing air from going underneath the car (which is the most un areodynamic part of the car). However, if the airdam is too low, it increases your frontal area, which can hurt fuel efficiency.

Airdams are typically considered the "easiest" way to prevent air from going under the car, therefore, car manufacturers typically skip out on doing a full underbelly tray.

Therefore, there is a fine line between too much air dam and not enough airdam.

__________________







See the rest of the Sti project log:
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...log-26612.html
  Reply With Quote