View Single Post
Old 06-16-2014, 05:58 PM   #12 (permalink)
darcane
.........................
 
darcane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Buckley, WA
Posts: 1,597
Thanks: 391
Thanked 488 Times in 316 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by cray54 View Post
FuelEconomy.gov:
(Chevy Suburban / Tahoe body style changed in 2000)
Although I'm looking for a 4WD, I had trouble finding specifications that could be compared. All the numbers below are for 2WD. The Chevy ratings are in back-to-back years with the 5.7L.
  • Chevy Suburban GMT800 00 12/17 mpg
  • Chevy Suburban GMT400 99 12/17 mpg
  • Chevy Tahoe GMT800 00 12/16 mpg
  • Chevy Tahoe GMT400 99 12/16 mpg
  • Dodge Durango 00 4.7L 13/18 mpg

The mileage ratings did not change from the 99 GMT400 to the 00 GMT800 for the Tahoe or the Suburban. I suppose I would seek the newest possible version, but a few thousand dollars in savings would allow for more improvements over stock.
I'd double-check that.
1999 had the 5.7L (Gen II small-block V8)
2000 had the 4.8L/5.3L/6.0L (Gen III small-block V8)

The 4.8L made more power than the 5.7L, but was rated at 13/18 in 2000 and 14/19 in 2005+

If you are finding specs for the 5.7L in 2000 it is probably the GTM400 Tahoe that they had a limited run of for 2000. GM likes to do that when they switch body styles.

2005 had some small aero improvements and electric fans. So, the '05-06 Tahoe is probably your best bet. Also, the EPA numbers don't account for optional gear ratios.

I bought my wife a Tahoe and picked it specifically for optimal fuel economy. 2005, 2WD, 4.8L, high gear ratio. She has a heavy foot and gets 13-15mpg city, 22-25mpg hwy.
__________________
Past Cars:

2001 Civic HX Mods

CTS-V

2003 Silverado Mods
  Reply With Quote