View Single Post
Old 08-18-2014, 08:34 AM   #13 (permalink)
aardvarcus
Master EcoModder
 
aardvarcus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Evensville, TN
Posts: 676

Deep Blue - '94 GMC Suburban K2500 SLE
90 day: 23.75 mpg (US)

Griffin (T4R) - '99 Toyota 4Runner SR5
90 day: 25.43 mpg (US)
Thanks: 237
Thanked 580 Times in 322 Posts
Higher or lower UTQG does not necessarily correlate into rolling resistance, especially across different brands. I have seen it work both ways on different occasions. Way too many variables between tread patterns, tread compounds, psi ranges, actual diameters, etcetera to directly correlate.

Also to clarify the three UTQG ratings are for treadwear, traction, and temperature. The speed rating is part of the service description, which consists of a load index and a speed rating.

For example, compare the following:
Michelin LTX M/S2
Size: P265/75R16
Serv. Desc: 114T
UTQG: 720 A A

Dick Cepek Trail Country
Size: 265/75R16
Serv. Desc: 116T
UTQG: 500 A B

Yes, a bit of an extreme example, but it should be clear from looking at the tread patterns which tire has lower RR, and note that the UTQG doesn’t correlate.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	UTQG.jpg
Views:	19
Size:	55.1 KB
ID:	15597  
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to aardvarcus For This Useful Post:
sully06 (08-18-2014)