View Single Post
Old 08-21-2014, 02:30 PM   #1 (permalink)
MetroMPG
Batman Junior
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,515

Blackfly - '98 Geo Metro
Team Metro
Last 3: 70.09 mpg (US)

MPGiata - '90 Mazda Miata
90 day: 52.71 mpg (US)

Even Fancier Metro - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage top spec
90 day: 70.75 mpg (US)

Appliance car - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage ES (base)
90 day: 52.48 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,062
Thanked 6,960 Times in 3,604 Posts
A/C vs MPG test: impact of air conditioning on fuel economy (2015 Nissan Micra)



Nothing ground-breaking here, but while I was test driving the new Micra, I decided to find out how much of an impact the A/C had on fuel consumption over a range of speeds.

(As an aside, these Micra results would also apply to the 1.6L Versa Note and Versa sedan. Same platform/drivetrain/components.)

I ran a bunch of bi-directional runs at 3 different speeds with the A/C on and off. The fan was left on the 2nd speed for all the runs, just toggling the A/C switch.

Results...

(Note: I graphed it for L/100 km, so those of you used to seeing graphs of "MPG" where the taller bar means better fuel economy, keep in mind it's reversed in this case.)




From: AC vs. MPG: impact of air conditioning on fuel economy tested - Micra-Forum.com


The average fuel consumption increase with A/C on vs. A/C off was 5.9%.

In retrospect, I wish I'd done a couple more 100 km/h runs, since it seemed to show that the A/C impact is smaller at higher speeds & engine loads. Though it makes sense that it would be, since you're covering more ground for a given power draw, plus the engine is probably sitting in a more efficient part of the BSFC map while it's providing that power to the compressor.

Code:
speed   AC      N.      S.      avg L/100 km*

60      off     4      4.1      4.05
        on      4.3    4.4      4.35
        on      4.3    4.5      4.37
        off     4.2    4.1      4.16
                        
80      off     5      4.5      4.75
        on      5.5    4.7      5.10
        off     5      4.5      4.75
                        
100     off     6.3    5.6      5.91
        on      6.6    5.8      6.15

(* Some of the averages are affected by rounded conversions of initial 
readings that were taken in MPG)

Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	ac-vs-mpg-chart-mpg-too.jpg
Views:	441
Size:	49.8 KB
ID:	15627   Click image for larger version

Name:	ac-vs-mpg.jpg
Views:	459
Size:	49.3 KB
ID:	15628   Click image for larger version

Name:	byc.jpg
Views:	283
Size:	63.5 KB
ID:	15637  
__________________
Project MPGiata! Mods for getting 50+ MPG from a 1990 Miata
Honda mods: Ecomodding my $800 Honda Fit 5-speed beater
Mitsu mods: 70 MPG in my ecomodded, dirt cheap, 3-cylinder Mirage.
Ecodriving test: Manual vs. automatic transmission MPG showdown



EcoModder
has launched a forum for the efficient new Mitsubishi Mirage
www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote
The Following 12 Users Say Thank You to MetroMPG For This Useful Post:
aerohead (08-22-2014), ecoTex (08-22-2014), fusion210 (08-22-2014), gone-ot (08-21-2014), jeff88 (08-21-2014), LeanBurn (08-22-2014), mcrews (08-23-2014), PaleMelanesian (08-21-2014), redpoint5 (08-21-2014), sendler (08-23-2014), some_other_dave (08-22-2014), Xist (08-23-2014)