View Single Post
Old 08-28-2014, 12:09 PM   #14 (permalink)
Big Dave
Master EcoModder
 
Big Dave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Steppes of Central Indiana
Posts: 1,319

The Red Baron - '00 Ford F-350 XLT
90 day: 27.99 mpg (US)

Impala Phase Zero - '96 Chevrolet Impala SS
90 day: 21.03 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 186 Times in 127 Posts
CNG is certainly beginning to make more and more economical sense.

Around here I can buy it in filling stations for about $2.50/gge. If I compress it (with a Phill) at home it costs $1.30/gge.

CNG also has another economy advantage: CNG gives you an honest 120 motor octane. It won't knock or ping regardless of compression ratio or spark advance. More compression general yields better efficiency which means better MPG. Practical limit is 13.5:1 compression ratio. Above that pumping losses exceed the thermodynamic gain.

Same with spark advance. In general, more spark advance = more efficiency, but at some point the limit is when the spark advance begins to break conn rods.

CNG's octane rating is so astronomical that even a 21:1 compression ration diesel will not compression ignite it. Natural gas is the one hydrocarbon I can think of that defeats a diesel. "Dual-fuel" engines use a little shot of diesel to compression-ignite and blow-torch the natural gas into combustion.
__________________
2000 Ford F-350 SC 4x2 6 Speed Manual
4" Slam
3.08:1 gears and Gear Vendor Overdrive
Rubber Conveyor Belt Air Dam
  Reply With Quote