View Single Post
Old 08-30-2014, 08:59 PM   #63 (permalink)
jedi_sol
Master EcoModder
 
jedi_sol's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Tustin, CA
Posts: 929

2013 STi *SOLD* - '13 Subaru Impreza WRX STi
Subaru
Sports Cars
Team Turbocharged!
90 day: 26.59 mpg (US)

1996 Geo Metro *RETIRED from Ecomodding* - '96 Geo Metro Base
90 day: 58.68 mpg (US)
Thanks: 368
Thanked 380 Times in 238 Posts
[QUOTE=Xist;443156
Jedi Sol, those are excellent articles, very well-written and informative. The author seems like an all-around great guy! However, I believe that Theaveng asked about rev-matching, instead of allowing the clutch to do it, and I must have missed that part of those articles.

I am pretty sure that I do not rev-match. Where is my cone of shame?[/QUOTE]

I dunno what's going on, I came into this thread too late.

I thought the debate was
-op feels Eoc not worth it due to accelerated clutc check wear
-however, if you Rev match, it saves clutch wear
-op asked if Rev match uses more fuel vs dragging clutch up to speed and asked for tests done by users

Therefore I posted metro mpg blogs about pulse and glide vs eoc...to show that eoc saves way more gas
__________________







See the rest of the Sti project log:
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...log-26612.html
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to jedi_sol For This Useful Post:
Baltothewolf (08-30-2014)