View Single Post
Old 11-23-2014, 01:04 PM   #127 (permalink)
MetroMPG
Batman Junior
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,534

Blackfly - '98 Geo Metro
Team Metro
Last 3: 70.09 mpg (US)

MPGiata - '90 Mazda Miata
90 day: 54.46 mpg (US)

Appliance car Mirage - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage ES (base)
90 day: 57.73 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,082
Thanked 6,979 Times in 3,614 Posts
failed MPG test: eco cam vs. power profile

I went out this morning to try to gather some MPG data with the eco cam profile on vs. off, but it didn't work out.

My plan was to simply unplug the electrical connector to the VTEC actuator to disable it for the comparison runs.

I realized it would probably set a check-engine light (it did), but I didn't expect it would also cause the cruise control to stop working. Disappointing! I just didn't feel like having to keep an eagle eye on the RPM to keep my speed dead steady for as-good-as-possible testing.

However...

On the two runs I did, I noticed the difference in MAP values on the ScanGauge. At 70 km/h (44 mph) on a level road, I saw values of roughly 7.2 - 7.8 with the eco cam profile active vs. 5.4 - 5.8 with the connector pulled.
__________________
Project MPGiata! Mods for getting 50+ MPG from a 1990 Miata
Honda mods: Ecomodding my $800 Honda Fit 5-speed beater
Mitsu mods: 70 MPG in my ecomodded, dirt cheap, 3-cylinder Mirage.
Ecodriving test: Manual vs. automatic transmission MPG showdown



EcoModder
has launched a forum for the efficient new Mitsubishi Mirage
www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to MetroMPG For This Useful Post:
PaleMelanesian (11-24-2014)