View Single Post
Old 02-28-2015, 04:50 AM   #28 (permalink)
Xist
Not Doug
 
Xist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Show Low, AZ
Posts: 12,240

Chorizo - '00 Honda Civic HX, baby! :D
90 day: 35.35 mpg (US)

Mid-Life Crisis Fighter - '99 Honda Accord LX
90 day: 34.2 mpg (US)

Gramps - '04 Toyota Camry LE
90 day: 35.39 mpg (US)

Don't hit me bro - '05 Toyota Camry LE
90 day: 30.49 mpg (US)
Thanks: 7,254
Thanked 2,233 Times in 1,723 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by euromodder View Post
The effect of shedding weight will be there, but as 100lbs is only a 3% loss, it's lost in the variations of everyday driving.
Isn't our rule of thumb that for every percent of weight (or Cd) reduction, fuel economy goes up half a percent? One and a half percent would get you from, for example, 50 MPG to 50.75, or a 900-mile range to 913.5.

I believe that my Civic has a full-sized spare. It is still in the trunk. I also have my floor jack, jack stands, wrench and socket set, other tools, and cordless screwdriver set. I do not know how much all of that weighs, although much of it is in one heavy duffel bag, and my last tank was 47.26 mpg (US), including stop-and-go traffic.

My fuel tank is 11.9 gallons and I have barely filled up more than eleven gallons twice, I usually do ten-something.

I saw the current Jetta commercial, advertising 44 MPG and an 814-mile range. I wondered who needed an 18.5-gallon tank.
  Reply With Quote