View Single Post
Old 03-13-2015, 08:45 AM   #47 (permalink)
BabyDiesel
Lean Burn Cruiser!
 
BabyDiesel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Johnston County, NC
Posts: 936

Big Blazin' - '88 Chevrolet K5 Blazer Silverado
SUV
90 day: 14.97 mpg (US)

Chili - '00 Honda Insight
Gen-1 Insights
Team Honda
House of Tudor
Team Streamliner
90 day: 72.29 mpg (US)
Thanks: 840
Thanked 491 Times in 310 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by adam728 View Post
If you are going to build the engine to be 10:1 compression, then yes, I'd go with what Comp suggested. With iron heads and the low rpm tuning of the TPI manifold that might still be pushing things in terms of detonation at low rpm, high loads.

To run the mpg cam on that link you'd likely want to run compression at no more than 9.0:1.
If I do remember correctly, the Light Duty TBI motors had a stock compression of 9.4:1 and they ran that itty bitty 166/175 cam with 112 LSA. The HD motors had 8.3:1 compression. Vortec 350's had 9.4:1

Here is a link to the info -> 95 LO5, Vin K, 5.7 TBI: Compression? - PerformanceTrucks.net Forums

My motor will have a 9.72:1 static compression with the present build, & and 8.103 DCR. So in theory! All should be well.

The key is the intake valve closing point

Edit: From what I can infer from Crower Cams website, the stock cam had roughly 10* of overlap and an excellent cylinder filling intake cycle. I do not doubt that the DCR was higher stock than will be in my build.
__________________



Remember, thank a fellow EM'er for a helpful post!!!
I hypermile better in my cowboy boots

Past threads:
ZX2 modding thread
Ecomodder's Top 10: How they do it!
ZX2 Aerodynamics: Shooting for 0.15 Cd
ZX2 coast-down testing for Cd & Crr

Last edited by BabyDiesel; 03-13-2015 at 08:55 AM..
  Reply With Quote