05-01-2015, 09:43 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
Lean Burn Cruiser!
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Johnston County, NC
Posts: 936
Thanks: 840
Thanked 491 Times in 310 Posts
|
Ford Escort ZX2 Aerodynamics
I'm starting a new thread here that will handle the aerodynamic aspects of my car exclusively
Here is some data on my car:
Stock Cd - 0.33, Ford ZX2 Automatic (2000)
Frontal area - 20.8 square feet, Ford ZX2 Automatic (2000)
Stock CdA - 6.9 square feet, Ford ZX2 Automatic (2000)
Stock Aerodynamic Resistance @ 62 m.p.h. - 15.8 kW/21.3 HPR, Ford ZX2 Automatic (2000)
Pretty good numbers for a 1998 car, but not good enough for us!
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to BabyDiesel For This Useful Post:
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
05-01-2015, 09:50 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
Lean Burn Cruiser!
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Johnston County, NC
Posts: 936
Thanks: 840
Thanked 491 Times in 310 Posts
|
So far, I have added the following mods:
Wheel covers; the side skirts and air dam are no longer on.
Foglight hole covers
Front belly pan
Rear belly pan
Windshield wiper cover
85% grill block
Fender skirts
I do plan on making new fender skirts that extend to the rear bumper, as some members have. The sharp edge will promote cleaner separation.
|
|
|
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to BabyDiesel For This Useful Post:
|
|
05-01-2015, 10:10 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
Lean Burn Cruiser!
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Johnston County, NC
Posts: 936
Thanks: 840
Thanked 491 Times in 310 Posts
|
I am planning on a kammback and eventually a boattail
Here is the template overlay -
For the front
I doubt that this is the proper way to go about a vehicle's front aerodynamics. I do want to improve the front aero, if possible.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to BabyDiesel For This Useful Post:
|
|
05-01-2015, 10:10 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 28,541
Thanks: 8,084
Thanked 8,877 Times in 7,326 Posts
|
How is the wiper arm shield mounted?
|
|
|
05-01-2015, 10:13 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
Lean Burn Cruiser!
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Johnston County, NC
Posts: 936
Thanks: 840
Thanked 491 Times in 310 Posts
|
Below the wipers, it is a tight space so it was originally wedged in place. A day of brutal crosswinds made me rethink that lol now it is held down with a few pieces of Gorilla tape.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to BabyDiesel For This Useful Post:
|
|
05-01-2015, 10:55 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
Lean Burn Cruiser!
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Johnston County, NC
Posts: 936
Thanks: 840
Thanked 491 Times in 310 Posts
|
Aerodynamic & rolling resistance, power & MPG calculator - EcoModder.com
I have been doing some playing around with this calculator. If my efficiency numbers check out, then I may have dropped my Cd down to the 0.28-0.29 level! That is awesome to me!
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to BabyDiesel For This Useful Post:
|
|
05-01-2015, 11:00 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 28,541
Thanks: 8,084
Thanked 8,877 Times in 7,326 Posts
|
Is it fixed to the hood or the cowl?
|
|
|
05-01-2015, 11:02 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
Lean Burn Cruiser!
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Johnston County, NC
Posts: 936
Thanks: 840
Thanked 491 Times in 310 Posts
|
With more weight reduction, LRR tires, a Cd of 0.19, a drivetrain efficiency of .90 for a manual swap, and 77* air puts me at 70-80 mpg for my usual drive speeds of 45-50 mph (theoretically)
Aerodynamic & rolling resistance, power & MPG calculator - EcoModder.com
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to BabyDiesel For This Useful Post:
|
|
05-01-2015, 11:05 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
Lean Burn Cruiser!
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Johnston County, NC
Posts: 936
Thanks: 840
Thanked 491 Times in 310 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by freebeard
Is it fixed to the hood or the cowl?
|
Neither, it is fitted in-between hood and the wipers.
A picture may help to explain it better. I'll get you one tomorrow!
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to BabyDiesel For This Useful Post:
|
|
05-02-2015, 02:14 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,265
Thanks: 24,389
Thanked 7,360 Times in 4,760 Posts
|
reverse-template
Quote:
Originally Posted by BabyDiesel
I am planning on a kammback and eventually a boattail
Here is the template overlay -
For the front
I doubt that this is the proper way to go about a vehicle's front aerodynamics. I do want to improve the front aero, if possible.
|
Eiffel and Hoerner both tested reversed streamline bodies ,and while the drag was higher,as half-bodies,and with wheels attached,I guestimate that you could see Cd 0.13 for a perfectly smooth wind tunnel model.
What we don't know,is if we can cheat on the windshield.If we can't,then the angles of the glass would make it impossible to see out of the car.
'Elliptical' bodies have the same drag as teardrop bodies,for the same fineness ratio,so I don't think you can hurt anything by extending the front.The pro's might say that you're creating undue additional skin friction.
Testing would tell.
__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to aerohead For This Useful Post:
|
|
|