View Single Post
Old 05-02-2015, 11:57 PM   #13 (permalink)
BabyDiesel
Lean Burn Cruiser!
 
BabyDiesel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Johnston County, NC
Posts: 931

Big Blazin' - '88 Chevrolet K5 Blazer Silverado
SUV
90 day: 14.97 mpg (US)

Chili - '00 Honda Insight
Gen-1 Insights
Team Honda
House of Tudor
Team Streamliner
90 day: 72.29 mpg (US)
Thanks: 835
Thanked 490 Times in 309 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by aerohead View Post
Eiffel and Hoerner both tested reversed streamline bodies ,and while the drag was higher,as half-bodies,and with wheels attached,I guestimate that you could see Cd 0.13 for a perfectly smooth wind tunnel model.
What we don't know,is if we can cheat on the windshield.If we can't,then the angles of the glass would make it impossible to see out of the car.
'Elliptical' bodies have the same drag as teardrop bodies,for the same fineness ratio,so I don't think you can hurt anything by extending the front.The pro's might say that you're creating undue additional skin friction.
Testing would tell.
0.13 Cd?!?!?!? That is crazy talk!

I have thought about doing a second windshield similar to what basjoos did on his aerocivic. He said in another thread that while he didn't have exact numbers, it did help improve his coasting distance. With a car as light and as aerodynamic as his, I am guessing randomly that his Cd key have dropped close to 0.15.



What exactly do you mean by cheat the windshield?

I do plan on extending the front. I need to lower the stagnation point so air can flow over the Top, rather than under my car. I probably won't extend it to match the template... If I did, LOL
__________________



Remember, thank a fellow EM'er for a helpful post!!!
I hypermile better in my cowboy boots

Past threads:
ZX2 modding thread
Ecomodder's Top 10: How they do it!
ZX2 Aerodynamics: Shooting for 0.15 Cd
ZX2 coast-down testing for Cd & Crr
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to BabyDiesel For This Useful Post:
MobilOne (05-05-2015)