View Single Post
Old 05-03-2015, 01:05 AM   #14 (permalink)
BabyDiesel
Lean Burn Cruiser!
 
BabyDiesel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Johnston County, NC
Posts: 936

Big Blazin' - '88 Chevrolet K5 Blazer Silverado
SUV
90 day: 14.97 mpg (US)

Chili - '00 Honda Insight
Gen-1 Insights
Team Honda
House of Tudor
Team Streamliner
90 day: 72.29 mpg (US)
Thanks: 840
Thanked 491 Times in 310 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by aerohead View Post
The Cd 0.19 GM Ultralite was rated at 100-mpg @ 50-mph.You're frontal area wouldn't be much different,and at cruising speed you're weight wouldn't slay you.
GM did have tires with something like 60% less rolling drag than conventional steel radials of the day.I suspect that this gap has closed since 1991.


That is great news, aerohead! So I could be looking at having a 100+ mpg car if I max the aero out. Just the motivation I need

It is good to hear that my frontal area will not differ very much. I was concerned that it was already a penalty to overcome. What I do have planned to help lower FA is the give the ZX2 a Probe IV treatment. I plan on lowering just the front, and maybe lifting the rear 0.5-1" ONLY if it would help aero.

I suspect the same as well. Sounds like they had RE92s haha. I plan on going with them as my next set of tires, unless there is another tire with lower LRR.
__________________



Remember, thank a fellow EM'er for a helpful post!!!
I hypermile better in my cowboy boots

Past threads:
ZX2 modding thread
Ecomodder's Top 10: How they do it!
ZX2 Aerodynamics: Shooting for 0.15 Cd
ZX2 coast-down testing for Cd & Crr
  Reply With Quote