Quote:
Originally Posted by Hersbird
"safety" is just a nice byproduct.
|
One of the obvious objections is that people are stating this as fact. And it really remains to be seen, and it is likely incredibly conditional (i.e. only "safe" on closed courses with other robot cars, and/or during peacetime).
If they actually sort out a computer that can compete with a human driver, I wouldn't think that encryption would be a reliable mechanism any more.
Even chess computers take a long time to sort out all the possible moves, and that is a dead simple 8x8 2d grid.
Google has reached a point where they can literally tilt the table on public opinion, on any subject, just by tweaking search results, and they clearly want infinitely more data. To be anything but sceptical at this point is to be willfully ignorant.
All the assurances in the world are completely useless speculation. You have to string a lot of assumptions together just to make a "maybe it could possibly be ecomodder related" case. Though it may be even more likely to run into things if you reduce the drag with no way of telling it (insert more speculation here).
wild speculation, very unicorn-like. This is a complete clusterf*ck of naivete, capitalization, fearmongering, hype (or outright BS) and railroading. Probably %80 of the population has some of these companies in their 401k somewhere :/