View Single Post
Old 08-05-2015, 08:55 PM   #12 (permalink)
oldtamiyaphile
Master EcoModder
 
oldtamiyaphile's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,510

UFI - '12 Fiat 500 Twinair
Team Turbocharged!
90 day: 40.3 mpg (US)

Jeep - '05 Jeep Wrangler Renegade
90 day: 18.09 mpg (US)

R32 - '89 Nissan Skyline

STiG - '16 Renault Trafic 140dCi Energy
90 day: 30.12 mpg (US)

Prius - '05 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 50.25 mpg (US)

Premodded - '49 Ford Freighter
90 day: 13.48 mpg (US)

F-117 - '10 Proton Arena GLSi
Pickups
Mitsubishi
90 day: 37.82 mpg (US)

Ralica - '85 Toyota Celica ST
90 day: 25.23 mpg (US)

Sx4 - '07 Suzuki Sx4
90 day: 32.21 mpg (US)

F-117 (2) - '03 Citroen Xsara VTS
90 day: 30.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 325
Thanked 452 Times in 319 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by elhigh View Post
That's an awful lot of mass to tow around with a 1.2. I reckon once it gets up to speed it isn't too bad though. God knows the TDI engines make good torque for their size, if you have the time I don't doubt it'll accelerate up to highway speed eventually.
Renault is one of the first in modern times to go to a really small engine for a really big car, in the Trafic, you get 1.6 litres to move a 1700kg van. It still does 0-62 in 10.8 seconds (still faster than some hatchbacks), and is rated for a total train weight of 5 tons

Looking at Vekke's figures, his car has the same power for less weight and a better frontal area. I thought the first tank was a disappointment, but the second tank shows promise. I'd have hated all that work to have gone to waste. But it looks like a 'fast enough' car that will do 60mpg now
__________________







Last edited by oldtamiyaphile; 08-05-2015 at 09:01 PM..
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to oldtamiyaphile For This Useful Post:
renault_megane_dci (08-06-2015)